Translate this page into:
A case series of Budd-Chiari syndrome in pregnancy undergoing elective caesarean section: Anaesthetic considerations
*Corresponding author: Dr. Mahalakshmi Ethiraj, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College and KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India. mahalakshmiethiraj94@gmail.com
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Ethiraj M, Patil Y. A case series of Budd-Chiari syndrome in pregnancy undergoing elective caesarean section: Anaesthetic considerations. Pract Evid Anaesth Knowl. 2025;1:80-82. doi: 10.25259/PEAK_11_2025
Abstract
Budd–Chiari syndrome (BCS) is an uncommon disorder caused by hepatic venous outflow obstruction leading to hepatomegaly, ascites, and abdominal pain. The condition poses significant challenges during pregnancy due to altered hepatic function, hypercoagulability, and increased haemodynamic demands. We present a series of three pregnant patients with known BCS scheduled for elective lower segment caesarean section, each managed using a multidisciplinary approach. All patients were on anticoagulation therapy during pregnancy and underwent careful preoperative assessment with haematology, gastroenterology, and obstetric consultations. Anticoagulants were discontinued 24 hours before surgery. Two patients received spinal anaesthesia, while one underwent general anaesthesia due to coagulopathy (international normalised ratio 1.6). Estimated intraoperative blood loss ranged from 800 to 1000 ml. All patients remained haemodynamically stable throughout the procedure and the postoperative period. Anticoagulation was resumed within 12–24 hours postoperatively, and no maternal or neonatal complications were reported. Pregnancy complicated by BCS requires vigilant planning and individualised anaesthetic management. A multidisciplinary approach, appropriate timing of anticoagulation discontinuation, and careful intraoperative monitoring are crucial to optimise maternal and foetal outcomes. Elective caesarean delivery in a tertiary care setting with close coordination between obstetrician, anaesthesiologist, haematology, and hepatology teams can significantly improve prognosis in women with BCS.
Keywords
Anaesthetic management
anticoagulation
budd-chiari syndrome
caesarean section
hepatosplenomegaly
INTRODUCTION
Budd–Chiari syndrome (BCS) is a rare hepatic disorder resulting from obstruction of hepatic venous outflow, leading to portal hypertension and liver dysfunction. The obstruction may involve the small hepatic veins, inferior vena cava (IVC), or both. Its estimated prevalence in Western countries is approximately 1 in 2.5 million people, but the incidence is higher in Asian regions, including India, China, and Nepal.[1]
BCS management typically follows a stepwise approach, starting with anticoagulation therapy and progressing to interventional procedures such as thrombectomy, percutaneous angioplasty, or transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), with liver transplantation reserved for refractory cases.[2]
Pregnancy in women with BCS is uncommon and often complicated by hypercoagulability and hepatic congestion. We describe three cases of parturients with known BCS undergoing elective caesarean section, focusing on anaesthetic considerations and perioperative multidisciplinary coordination.
CASE SERIES
Case 1
A 24-year-old woman (gravida 2 para 1 living 1) with known BCS was on aspirin 75 mg and subcutaneous enoxaparin 60 mg daily throughout pregnancy, discontinued 24 hours before elective lower segment caeserean section (LSCS). Preoperative evaluation revealed mild hepatosplenomegaly and dilated abdominal veins [Figure 1]. Platelet count was 1.6 × 105/cmm with a normal coagulation profile. Liver enzymes were within normal limits. High-risk consent was obtained considering potential blood loss.

- Dilated abdominal veins
Spinal anaesthesia was administered at the L3–L4 level using 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 10 µg fentanyl, achieving a T6 sensory block. A healthy neonate was delivered; estimated blood loss was 1000 mL. The intraoperative period was uneventful. Enoxaparin was restarted 12 hours postoperatively, and the patient recovered without complications. Follow-up was kept till 7 postoperative days, and the course was uneventful for both mother and baby.
Case 2
A 30-year-old woman (gravida 3 para 1 abortion 2) with BCS, on low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) 60 mg, presented for elective LSCS. LMWH was stopped 24 hours preoperatively. Laboratory findings showed international normalised ratio (INR) 1.6 and bilirubin 1.7 mg/dl. Mild hepatosplenomegaly was noted. In view of the elevated INR, general anaesthesia was chosen.
Following standard American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) monitoring, rapid sequence induction was achieved with intravenous propofol 80 mg and succinylcholine 100 mg, and anaesthesia was maintained with 50% oxygen/nitrous oxide and sevoflurane. A live neonate was delivered, and analgesia was provided with intravenous fentanyl 100 µg. Estimated blood loss was 800 mL. The patient was extubated uneventfully, remained haemodynamically stable, and LMWH was restarted 24 hours postoperatively. Both mother and baby were fine till discharge from the hospital.
Case 3
A 25-year-old primigravida with BCS was switched from warfarin 5 mg to LMWH 60 mg after conception at six weeks of pregnancy. Preoperative evaluation showed platelets 80,000/cmm and INR 1.3. High-risk consent was obtained. Spinal anaesthesia was administered with 2 mL of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and fentanyl 10 µg at L3-L4 space.
A live neonate was delivered with an estimated blood loss of 800 mL. The patient remained stable intraoperatively. LMWH was restarted 12 hours postoperatively, and her recovery was uneventful. Postoperative recovery was good for mother and baby, and they were discharged after hepatology consultation and follow-up with the obstetrician and hepatologist was advised.
DISCUSSION
Hepatobiliary diseases can pose great challenges for anaesthesiologists. Pregnancy-related BCS is well known and may manifest with symptoms such as abdominal pain, ascites, and hepatomegaly.[3] Pregnancy itself is a hypercoagulable state, and it is accompanied by several physiological changes, like an increase in blood volume, development of hypoproteinaemia, rise in intra-abdominal pressure, the pressure exerted by the gravid uterus on the IVC and other abdominal vessels. The growing uterus displaces various intra-abdominal organs, resulting in changes in normal anatomical positioning and relationships.[4] Therapeutic anticoagulation is the cornerstone of BCS management. During pregnancy, warfarin therapy should be transitioned to therapeutic doses of unfractionated heparin or LMWH within 6 weeks of conception and can be resumed postpartum to therapeutic doses of unfractionated heparin or LMWH within 6 weeks of becoming pregnant and can then resume warfarin postpartum.[5] Warfarin can cross the placenta, leading to congenital abnormalities called foetal warfarin syndrome.[6] There is a risk of spinal hematoma in patients undergoing anticoagulation therapy for neuraxial blockade. So, the decision to administer neuraxial or general anaesthesia should be made after weighing the risk-benefit ratio and individualised approach.[7]
When general anaesthesia is indicated, special attention should be given to airway management. Pregnancy itself increases the risk of a difficult airway, and any traumatic intubation can precipitate airway bleeding.[8] A gentle, well-planned induction is essential. Drugs with minimal hepatic metabolism and limited effects on hepatic blood flow, such as propofol- are preferred as they also preserve uterine tone during induction.[9] Neuromuscular blockade, like atracurium or cisatracurium, can be used as its metabolism and elimination do not depend on the liver. Maternal mortality may occur due to liver decompensation, bleeding varices, intraoperative and postoperative haemorrhage, pulmonary embolism, and deep vein thrombosis. The surgery duration should be minimised to reduce postoperative complications due to increased bleeding caused by low platelets, which is also a contributing factor.[10]
Postoperatively, intensive monitoring in an intensive care unit setting is recommended. Intravenous fluids should be titrated carefully to prevent dehydration–induced hypercoagulability, which may precipitate cerebral cortical venous thrombosis or deep vein thrombosis.[11] It is recommended to begin early ambulation and start administering therapeutic injection LMWH after consulting with an expert.[12] A multidisciplinary team with good monitoring can enhance maternal and foetal well-being in patients with BCS.
CONCLUSION
Pregnancy complicated by BCS presents a complex interplay of hepatic, haematologic, and obstetric risks. An individualised, multidisciplinary approach, including careful perioperative planning, coordination of anticoagulation, and vigilant monitoring, optimises outcomes. Elective caesarean delivery under a planned anaesthetic strategy in a tertiary care setting ensures safer outcomes for both mother and neonate.
Declaration of patient consent:
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Conflicts of interest:
There are no conflicts of interest.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:
The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.
Financial support and sponsorship: Nil
References
- Interventions in Budd-Chiari syndrome: An updated review. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025;50:1307-19.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pregnancy complicated by Budd-Chiari syndrome and antiphospholipid syndrome. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;29:145-6.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Budd-Chiari syndrome following pregnancy: Report of 16 cases, with roentgenologic, hemodynamic and histologic studies of the hepatic outflow tract. Am J Med. 1980;68:113-21.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Management of thromboembolism in pregnancy. Semin Perinatol. 2007;31:227-31.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Low-dose warfarin maternal anticoagulation and fetal warfarin syndrome. BMJ Case Rep. 2018;2018:bcr2017223159.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- StatPearls Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK606098/. [Last accessed 2025 November 24]
- [Google Scholar]
- Airway management guidelines in obstetrics. Acta Clin Croat. 2023;62:85-90.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The effect of propofol and desflurane anaesthesia on human hepatic blood flow: a pilot study. Anaesthesia. 2010;65:1085-93.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Successful pregnancy outcome in an operated case of Budd-Chiari syndrome having fetal growth restriction: A twisted tale of gravid. Cureus. 2023;15:e42745.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Pregnancy in Budd-Chiari syndrome: A case report. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2019;69:17-19.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pregnancy and vascular liver disease. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015;5:41-50.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
